Just the daily (or...sometimes daily) rantings of ME!
Okay, so this year I'm teaching second grade.

My homework expectations are very simple, and in MY mind, "just right." That being said, I am NOT a parent. I know that both parents and children are busy, so my homework is generally something very short that reinforces the general concepts we covered in class that day and reading practice. Math homework shouldn't take longer than 5 or 10 minutes at the VERY most, and I want my students to read for 15 minutes an evening (for right now, anyway...that amount will increase incrementally through the year). So...at the very MOST, that is between 20-30 minutes for homework.

Yet...out of 19 students, I only receive about 5-8 homeworks back each morning...not even half. Not a good average. Oh, there's lots of excuses, but I don't want those. Not day after day after day. I think I'm going to do an incentive for the students next week--if EVERYONE in the class brings their homework, each child can choose something out of my prize box. But that means that EVERY child has to be responsible, or the WHOLE class misses out. I like challenges like that. Hopefully it will entice children to spend the couple of minutes it takes and get it back to school.

So, parents, and the general public, what are YOUR thoughts on homework? How much is too much? Should it even be given in the elementary grades? I'm interested in your opinions.

Comments (Page 4)
6 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 6 
on Oct 14, 2007
a parent can put it in better terms than I can.


Unless of course...you know...they have no idea what the hell they're doing. I don't think my parents helped me with any homework after first grade.

~Zoo
on Oct 14, 2007
Repetition. We all learn from repetition.


Paulo Freire would hate you . . .
on Oct 14, 2007
The teachers on;y teach it once, then?


No of course not but it's one thing to do the work under the teacher's care and gudance in the classroom and another in a diff setting. Repetition helps to cement what was taught in the classroom. When they do the HW and see the corrected paper later they can learn from their mistakes.

Diff teachers have diff methods and personalities. I found with my kids and others along the way that there were certain personality conflicts that come into play. Sometimes a child just doesn't do well with a certain teacher. Sometimes it's plain and simple the teacher is just not a good communicator and while may know the material, may not be very good at transferring her/his ideas to the kids.

That and sometimes you do just run into a lazy teacher who is there to collect a paycheck. Rare, but seen it happen a few times.

Paulo Freire would hate you


who?

teach things more than once, but honestly, lots of times, if a student doesn't understand something, a parent can put it in better terms than I can.


I agree with this. I know one of my kids had a problem with fractions and by doing HW together he got it. I was able to put it in a way he could understand. Maybe the teacher didn't speak his language or maybe he needed the one to one instruction but regardless the HW time was what helped him finally "get it."



on Oct 14, 2007
Paulo Freire would hate you


who?


"Perhaps the most influential thinker about education in the late twentieth century, Paulo Freire has been particularly popular with informal educators with his emphasis on dialogue and his concern for the oppressed."

WWW Link

I find things.

~Zoo
on Oct 14, 2007
Thanks, Zoo!

Freire's a stud too, for the record.
on Oct 14, 2007
I didn't understand two and three-digit subtraction with borrowing until my grandmother sat down with me once in fourth grade and helped me figure it out. My teacher just wasn't teaching it like *I* need to get it. It wasn't that he wasn't a good teacher, I just didn't understand.
on Oct 14, 2007
Freire's a stud too, for the record.


ummmmm.....NOT!

on Oct 15, 2007
ummmmm.....NOT!


How can you so quickly dismiss someone you hadn't heard about until thirty minutes ago?
on Oct 15, 2007
Freire's a stud too


yikes  
on Oct 15, 2007

I didn't understand two and three-digit subtraction with borrowing until my grandmother sat down with me once in fourth grade and helped me figure it out. My teacher just wasn't teaching it like *I* need to get it. It wasn't that he wasn't a good teacher, I just didn't understand.

But, what happens if there is nobody at home that can help?  The problem with relying on homework is that you are assuming that there are educated parents at home that can help.  The problem is that there isn't always somebody at home that can help teach anything other than the instructions that you send home (assuming that you send them home).

Also, in that scenario, the argument about repetition is thrown out the window.  If you have it repeated at school and don't understand it, yet somebody else is able to teach it a different way- it's not repetition that is helping you learn.

on Oct 15, 2007
Also, in that scenario, the argument about repetition is thrown out the window. If you have it repeated at school and don't understand it, yet somebody else is able to teach it a different way- it's not repetition that is helping you learn.


I wasn't arguing for repetition.

The kids who don't have someone at home to help them (which is crap...it's adults choosing NOT to help or care at this level) just don't turn it in. The directions are sent home and are very clear. There is no NEW content being sent home. If the child put forth a smidge of effort in class, he or she should be able to get it by him or herself at home without adult supervision.

How does a teacher satisfy everyone? If I didn't send homework home, half of the families would complain. When I send it home, hardly any of it gets returned anyway. And then those are the parents that complain that I'm not "communicating" what's going on in class, when in fact, I communicate our goings-on DAILY. You're damned if you do, damned if you don't.
on Oct 15, 2007
The problem with relying on homework is that you are assuming that there are educated parents at home that can help.


It's not about relying on HW. It's about cementing new concepts that are freshly learned. It's about training your brain to think in a new way. That's why I said repetition is helpful. Now I'm not saying usless or junk repetition but just enough for the child,teacher and parent know that he's got it.

The problem is that there isn't always somebody at home that can help teach anything other than the instructions that you send home (assuming that you send them home).


This is true. But what about parents that are home and would like to see their child have some HW? I was one of those parents. I would assume the teacher was a lazy teacher if she didn't send home any HW because she/he didn't want to correct papers.

How does a teacher satisfy everyone?


You can't. Impossible. You have to go with your gut. If they seem as if they totally get a concept maybe that's all that's needed. But if there seems to be a struggle classwide,then doing HW would be good practice for them to learn this new way. I also think HW is good discipline for them in all sorts of ways other than just doing the work itself. It's teaching them responsibility in completing a task and turning it in at a proper time.







on Oct 15, 2007
Marcie-
You have to realize that it's NOT teachers testing the crap out of kids. It all trickles down from NCLB.


Oh, I realize that, Marcie. My mother's a public school teacher (and has been for the last 40 years). I realize quite a bit of what's going on. I also realize that the "teaching to the test" is something that the school DISTRICT emphasizes more so than the individual teacher.

You don't want your tax dollars to pay teachers to be test proxies? Email, call, or write your representatives in Washington and in your states and let them know how much you think all this testing sucks. Vote for candidates who are for major NCLB reform.


Been there. Done That. Still do it. I've disagreed with NCLB (and got into several rather ... heated ... debates with the maternal unit over it.

See, I come from the POV that my 9 year old autistic son, no matter how frighteningly intelligent he is, is not going to be working to the same standard that his little sister (arguable the smartest of the bunch of smart kids) will be at the same age. They just don't THINK in the same manner.


KFC -
It's not about relying on HW. It's about cementing new concepts that are freshly learned. It's about training your brain to think in a new way. That's why I said repetition is helpful. Now I'm not saying usless or junk repetition but just enough for the child,teacher and parent know that he's got it.


Now, that's my problem with homework. Admittedly, I've ALWAYS had a problem with homework. Part of it comes from the fact that I'm a lazy SOB by nature. The other part comes from the fact that I've NOT needed the "reinforcement" or the "cementing new concepts". With my children, when they were in the local school system, this wasn't what the homework was trying to accomplish. It was information that was NOT covered in school. They were using the homework to cover material that was supposed to be covered in class, but wasn't.
on Oct 15, 2007
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE find a copy of "The Case against Homework" and read it. Check out http://stophomework.com/.

It is amazing to me that "good Homework practices" are not taught as a class in university for upcoming teachers. That's crazy. But the reason it's not taught I think is that there have not been good studies of what is the right amount.

I have told my wife, daughter, her teacher and the administration that I think 10 minutes per grade is appropriate and about the max I will have her do. After 20 minutes (in her case) I'll either know she knows the material or know she doesn't and the teacher needs to do something different (or I do). Doing the problems wrong for an hour doesn't make a kid learn it. it just reinforces the wrong way to do it.

The fact is I'm not a teacher. I don't know how she is teaching and I may not do it the "right" way. [I recall huge fights with my older girls for doing math homework "THE WRONG WAY!!"]

On a personal level, I was a D/C student because of homework. I aced tests and got concepts but refused to waste my time on meaningless work. I won't do that to my kids. And I won't take time away from being with the family or unstructured play so a teacher can have make-work that takes up 30+% of a grade (which I think is crazy). Base grades on understanding (tests + classroom discussion).

As an aside; my family reads for pleasure. Reading at grade level teaches spelling, grammar, comprehension, and critical thinking. This reading does not factor into the 10 minute per grade rule. Reading assignments for class does count.
on Oct 15, 2007
Tex . .if homework is so hard and your kid is getting the concept . . try to meet with the teacher and negotiate a compromise.

Try to get the teacher to allow you to do half of every assignment. Every odd number, or some such crap. Talk them into agreeing that "getting the concept" is the point of the homework. Get them to agree that "of course it's not busy-work". Then spring the "half-homework for a month" plan. They'll have a hard time arguing with it if you've already won the first to points.

Now you have a place to start a dialog. After a month . . meet again and see what the results were. If your kid is as smart as you claim they'll glom onto this plan and work their asses off to meet it. Work the amount of homework down to what you and the teach think is reasonable to prove knowledge of the concept. Be ready if it fails to step in to fix whatever the problem is.
6 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 6